Richard Zukowski, 49, owned and operated an independent recruiting firm called the David Anthony Group Inc., or DAG. The company maintained a contract with the Cleveland Clinic from 2008 through January 2013 to help locate and recruit certified registered nurse anesthetists to work within the Clinic’s Anesthesiology Institute, according to the criminal information.
The Cleveland Clinic paid DAG commissions, equal to a percentage of the first year annual salary, for each successful certified registered nurse anesthetist recruited by DAG, according to the information.
An individual identified as R.B. was the institute administrator within the Anesthesiology Institute at the Cleveland Clinic. R.B. submitted invoices related to the commissions for people purportedly recruited by DAG. An individual identified as J.T. was the institute finance director for the Anesthesiology Institute at the Cleveland Clinic. J.T. approved invoices related to commissions for individuals purportedly recruited by DAG, according to the information.
Zukowski conspired with R.B. from about June 15, 2010 through around January 2013, according to the information.
R.B. provided names, dates of invoice, and DAG commission figures to Zukowski for 10 individuals. R.B. instructed Zukowski to submit a recruiting invoice through DAG for each individual whose name R.B. provided. At no point did Zukowski or DAG recruit the 10 individuals for employment at the Cleveland Clinic, according to the information.
R.B. requested J.T. authorize the 10 invoices submitted by Zukowski. J.T. authorized the payments and routed the approved invoices for payment at the Cleveland Clinic. The Cleveland Clinic mailed Zukowski eight checks that totaled $179,040, according to the information.
R.B. then asked Zukowski to return half the money Zukowski received as payment for the invoices. In order to fulfill his tax obligations for the eight checks, Zukowski transferred only about one-third of the proceeds to R.B. Zukowski withdrew approximately $60,000 in cash, in increments between $1,500 and $2,000, and hand delivered the cash to R.B. in envelopes, according to the information.
This case is being prosecuted by Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Derek Kleinmann following an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
If convicted, the defendant’s sentence will be determined by the court after review of factors unique to this case, including the defendant’s prior criminal record, if any, the defendant’s role in the offense and the characteristics of the violation. In all cases, the sentence will not exceed the statutory maximum, and in most cases it will be less than the maximum.
An information is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. A defendant is entitled to a fair trial in which it will be the government’s burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
